The Third Manifesto (Third Edition) book does not seem to require INIT clause in case of scalar types.
Therefore I have a question - is it a bug or a feature?
If it is a feature, hen how should I define a type with for instance three different possible representations?
Search found 2 matches
- Sat Apr 17, 2010 1:48 pm
- Forum: Language Issues
- Topic: Trouble with TYPE
- Replies: 11
- Views: 19687
- Thu Apr 15, 2010 12:39 pm
- Forum: Language Issues
- Topic: Trouble with TYPE
- Replies: 11
- Views: 19687
Re: Trouble with TYPE
I have some trouble with the use of TYPE in the rel version 0.3.20 I try to execute a command: TYPE POINT POSSREP CARTESIAN {X RATIONAL, Y RATIONAL} POSSREP POLAR {R RATIONAL, THETA RATIONAL}; The system replies: ERROR: POSSREP 'CARTESIAN' has no INITialisation. It was possible to execute the statem...